Discover the Archetypes Shaping Your Life
In our work with people using both the PMAI and MBTI instruments, we see two relationships between type and archetype.

Archetypes and Personality Type

The Empirical Relationship between the PMAI® and MBTI® Tools

Jun 17, 2024
Kesstan Blandin, PhD
Kesstan Blandin, PhD is the Vice President of Research and Development at Myers & Briggs Foundation in Gainesville, FL. Previous to this, Dr. Blandin was a research psychologist specializing in dementia at the Dartmouth Centers for Health & Aging at Dartmouth College.
View full author bio | Close

This is the second article in a four-part series discussing the relationships between Jung’s theories of archetypes and psychological types, as assessed by the Pearson-Marr Archetype Indicator® and Myers-Brigg Type Indicator® instruments, respectively. The first article discussed the ways the theories of archetype and type converge and diverge—how they overlap and where they are distinct. This current article presents the results of a large, correlational study between the PMAI® and MBTI® tools. The final articles in the series will discuss insights from our qualitative research and workshops and understanding the PMAI archetypes in cultural narratives.

When considering the relationship between Jung’s concepts of psychological type and archetypes, there are several common-sense predictions we might make when thinking about how results on the MBTI and PMAI assessments would be linked statistically. For example, an obvious prediction is that a high score on the Caregiver archetype would correlate with a preference for Feeling on the MBTI instrument. Another prediction might be that a preference for Thinking would score low on the Caregiver and Lover archetypes.  

Both predictions were met in a large correlational study we conducted of over 1000 people who took the PMAI instrument and self-reported their MBTI type. Of the sample, preferences for Intuition (81%) and Introversion (64%) were predominant, while preferences for Thinking-Feeling and Judging-Perceiving were split more evenly, though slightly higher for Feeling and Judging. Of note in our sample is that of the 16 MBTI types, Sensing types had only 11 to 45 respondents linked with the 12 archetypes.  

This preponderance of Intuition in the PMAI sample indicates that people who prefer Intuition tend to take assessments such as the PMAI more than people who prefer Sensing. And this would be predicted, as people with a preference for Intuition tend to be more open and curious about abstract concepts and drawn to symbolic ideas. Those with a Sensing preference, on the other hand, are drawn towards the literal and concrete and would be predicted to tend to avoid symbolic systems. 

The following analysis discusses the correlations between the high and low scores each of the 16 MBTI types had on each of the 12 PMAI archetypes. We calculated the average score, or mean, of each archetype for each group of people who reported the same type. In other words, the mean is the average score on each archetype scale of everyone in the sample who reported preferences for ESTP, for example. Whole types with the highest means had the highest scores on that archetype; the types with the lowest means had the lowest scores. 

Caregiver. The highest mean for Caregiver were the types ESFJ and ENFJ.  The lowest means were INTP and INTJ. These results would be expected. These dominant Extraverted Feeling types embody the extraverted, empathic, helping person, and the INT types represent autonomous intellectuals who keep to themselves. 

Creator. Types dominant in Intuition lead in the scale means for Creator, as would be predicted: ENFP and ENTP. The results were split first between Intuition and Sensing, and second between Perceiving and Judging, whereas types with preferences for Intuition Perceiving showed the highest means. This makes sense, as Intuition and Perceiving together represent people who are open imaginatively and intellectually and would be expected to identify as being creative. 

Idealist. The results for Idealist were split along the Extraversion–Introversion preference, with seven of the eight Extraverted types showing the highest means (except for ESTP). The highest means were ESFP and ESTJ. Unexpected in these results for Idealist is that the mean scores fell along the Extraversion–Introversion preference rather than the Intuition–Sensing preference. The prediction was that a preference for Intuition would score higher than a preference for Sensing, yet Extraverted Sensing types scored higher than types with a preference for Intuition.  

The psychological type most symbolic of the Idealist is INFP, yet this type is among the lowest scores. The very lowest means are with ISTP and INTJ, which fall along more expected lines as these are two hard-nosed intellectual types. These unusual results for Idealist may reflect anomalies in the sample, such as a misreporting of type in the sample, and present a good case for further research. 

Jester. The results for this archetype also fell along the Extraverted–Introverted preference pair, with Extraverted types scoring higher means. INFP is the only Introverted type among those with a higher mean for Jester. The highest Jester means are for ESTP and ENFP, two of the most jovial, outgoing, pleasure-seeking party types.  

The lowest means are with ISTJ and INFJ, two serious types. INFJ is known to be particularly emotionally deep and intense, and perhaps ISTJ, the “work horse” of the type, is just too busy getting things done to find life so funny. 

Lover. As we would predict, Lover mean scores were distinguished on the preferences for Thinking and Feeling with the highest means in Feeling. The two highest types represented are ISFP, a gentle, sympathetic soul, and ENFJ, an outgoing, compassionate and supportive person. The lowest means for Lover were also expected types: ISTP, INTP, and INTJ, all three representing autonomous intellectual types. 

Magician. The top means of this archetype are types with a Feeling preference and those predominantly paired with a preference for Intuition: ENFP, ENFJ, INFJ, and ISFP.  The Magician’s sensitivity to the patterns and realities behind what is obvious or manifested is represented by Intuition, while the Magician’s healing capacity would predict a preference for Feeling.  

The lowest means are represented by primarily dominant Sensing types and one dominant Thinking type: ISTJ, ISFJ, ESTP, and INTP. Sensing has a proclivity for the practical and grounded; thus, tales of the invisible would not be as impressive to those with this preference. And INTP represents the skeptic Sage, who would naturally question the Magician’s claims. 

Realist. The scores on this archetype fall along predictable lines, with the top three types representing hard-nosed intellectual critics with preferences for Thinking and Judging: ISTJ, ESTJ, and INTJ. A preference for Sensing aligns with the practical Realist who has a long memory, whereas a preference for Intuition is typically more focused on future possibilities and thus, generally, more optimistic. The intense critical faculty of the INTJ likely tempers the possibility of a sunnier outlook. 

The lowest means for Realist are three types with preferences for Extraversion and Perceiving: ENFP, ENTP, and ESFP. The Extraverted Perceiving types live in open possibilities, not a strong suit for the Realist. We might expect the Sensing preference in ESFP to resonate more with the Realist, but it appears that the fun-loving preferences of EFP are more dominant. 

Ruler. Typological results for Ruler are dominated by a preference for Thinking and Judging, with the four TJ types showing the highest scores—ESTJ, ENTJ, INTJ, and ISTJ—followed very closely by ENFJ and ESFJ. These results match predictions based on many studies with the MBTI instrument that find people with preferences for Thinking and Judging in positions of authority and leadership professionally.   

The tender and imaginative INFP had the lowest mean on Ruler, followed by INFJ. Though decisive and assertive, like all Judging types, INFJ is not “tough-minded” like the TJs or engaging readily with the challenges of leading others, like Extraverted types. INFJ embodies internal contradictions: willful and influential, yet also hyper-sensitive to others’ feelings, making the hard edges of the Ruler archetype less palatable. 

Revolutionary. The means for this archetype split along the Intuition–Sensing preference pair, with the top three means held by dominant Intuition types: ENTP, ENFP, and INTJ. A preference for Intuition brings an imaginative and intellectual drive to transcend tradition, limits, and precedents. These three types represent two primary qualities of the Revolutionary: innovation and challenging the status quo.  

ENTP and ENFP are two types who simply follow their own way without much concern about the status quo or who approves. Studies of innovation in organizations reliably show ENTP and ENFP in innovative fields and positions. The Judging preference in INTJ is hyper-aware of who holds power and, combined with Thinking will readily challenge an authority system or rules that they see as incompetent, unprincipled, or unnecessary. 

Sage. The means of this archetype demonstrated both expected and unexpected findings. First, the expected results: INTJ and INTP were in the top three types for Sage. Both INTJ and INTP are exemplars of the Sage: introverted, academic, intensely intellectual, and ones who follow their ideas regardless of where they lead or the disruption they may cause.  

The unexpected result is that the highest scoring mean for Sage was ISFP, the only Sensing type in the top scores. The intelligence of the Sensing preference is more practical and applied, captured by the image of the engineer rather than the academic. We might expect Sensing types to be less identified with Sage. However, it could be that the sensitive imagination of the ISFP is especially open and curious about the world at large.  

This result could also be an anomaly in the convenience sample, as ISFP has the least representation in the sample: only 11 people self-reported ISFP. It may be that this small group of ISFP preferences represents a different kind of Sage, one that is more of an internally focused Buddhist who lives in the present and is open to change.  

Seeker. The Seeker archetype has the highest mean of all the archetypes—symbolically appropriate for the elevated and optimistic aims of the Seeker—held in order by ISFP, ENFP, ENFJ, INFJ, INFP, and ESFJ. The predominance of Feeling followed by Intuition suits the nature of the Seeker, one who imagines future possibilities and follows them whether physically or imaginatively—or both. The NF types are most driven by authenticity, aligning with the Seeker’s pursuit of one’s authentic self.  

That a Sensing type, ISFP, represents the highest mean score is unusual in that the Sensing function does not typically focus on future possibilities and adventures. This may be due to some unique qualities in this small group of ISFP preferences in the sample discussed above. The lowest scoring types fall in line with expectations: ISTP, ISFJ, ESTP, and ISTJ. 

Warrior. The top type results for this archetype are as would be predicted, represented by the four types with preferences for both Extraversion and Thinking: ENTJ, ENTP, ESTJ, and ESTP. These four are assertive, outgoing, driven, and tough-minded types. Closely following these top four are the two Introverted types who prefer Thinking and Judging: INTJ and ISTJ.  

Placing in the lowest positions are INFP, ISTP, and ISFJ. INFP may be too sensitive and imaginative to be drawn towards the aggression of the Warrior, while ISTP and ISFJ may be too restrained and involved in the practicalities of living. 


In a large correlational study linking results on the PMAI assessment with MBTI type, many predictions between preferences and archetype attributes were met, and a few surprises that may lead to provocative areas for future research. The results of the study reported here match predictions of a previous correlational study between the PMAI and MBTI assessments, which you can find in the Journal of Psychological Type

These links between type and archetype point to the identification of qualities and attributes between the two models. In our work with people using both the PMAI and MBTI instruments, we see two relationships between type and archetype. The first is what this correlational study demonstrates very well: that personality type preferences naturally identify with archetypes that align with their attributes and attitudes.  

The second way the PMAI archetypes show up for people is as constellated narratives in specific relationships, environments, and situations, such as with a particular colleague, with one’s family, or when one is on vacation. Deeper discussions of archetypes as personalities and as narratives can be found in books by PMAI authors: What Stories Are You Living? Discover Your Archetypes – Transform Your Life! by Carol Pearson and Finding Your Story: Using Archetypes to Guide Your Personal Journey by Hugh Marr. 


Related Content

Enacting the hero's journey as story When Is a Story Archetypal?
by Kesstan Blandin, PhD

We know the facts—that we are currently one of 8 billion people on the planet, that in the greater scheme of humanity and the cosmos we will live and die anonymously - but this is not how you and I live. You are striving, battling, and loving through an epic drama. Each time you triumph, each time you fail, you gain the wisdom of living for the first time, as every hero has done through time. Every one of us senses our mysterious potential, often ambiguous and vague, yet emotionally compelling in its lure towards who we can be. We sense as well that the hard facts of life do not provide access to this level of potential, but where to turn for guidance?


Jung & Archetypes
The Pearson-Marr Archetype Indicator® (PMAI®) is rooted in the theories of C. G. Jung. Jung's view of archetypes, a concept he didn't coin but was the first to apply to the structure and experience of the psyche or mind, is based on his understanding of the various levels of the psyche or mind (conscious and unconscious).


Gal Gadot as Wonder Woman with arms crossed at the wrists Pearson's & Heroic Archetypal Characters
Carol Pearson,PhD has a unique presence in the field of Jungian archetypes. First, Pearson's work is about twelve heroic archetypes that she discovered appear across culture, time, and stories, such as myths, fairy tales, literature, and religion. The theory uses the metaphor of the heroic journey as a structure for ordering archetypes as they commonly occur in the course of Western adult development.


Living the Heroic Life Journey: Part 1
Mar 04, 2020 by Carol S. Pearson, PhD, DMin and Hugh Marr, PhD, LPC

Studying Jungian psychology helped me figure out that living builds inner psychological structure. Jung described how, in the first half of life, we need to form a healthy ego, while in the later half of life the task is to connect with the Self, an accomplishment which takes us to a deeper understanding of who we are and a capacity for feeling more connected to others and the world.


When it is the lowest archetype in your profile, embodying the archetypal Caregiver can transform a Blind Spot into a heroic journey. Hidden Gold in the Shadow
Nov 17, 2022 by Kesstan Blandin, PhD

My younger sister, Carmen, is quite close in age to me – just a year apart – but distant in personality. Growing up, my naturally sensitive, caring, generous sibling would often say to me that I just didn’t have that “caregiver gene.” She was right. Where Carmen was motivated to generate positive emotions in herself and others, I was fascinated by the dark nether regions of the mind and imagination. Where Carmen naturally trusted and nurtured others’ vulnerabilities, I probed the hidden secrets and conflicted natures of myself and others.


illustration of Icarus falling from the Sun When You Need a New Perspective
by Carol S. Pearson, PhD, DMin

Habitual attitudes often blind us to new possibilities and options. Life is most rewarding for me when I am growing and learning. I’ve found that the archetypes that are dominant for me and others are important for authenticity and for the primary lessons we are learning at any given time.


Living the Heroic Life Journey: Part 2
by Carol S. Pearson, PhD, DMin and Hugh Marr, PhD, LPC

The meaning of "soul" used in depth psychology does not necessarily imply the religious meaning of what is eternal about you; rather, it is about discovering the deeper, more essential "you" that exists now. While many people have trouble understanding what soul is, most of us know what it means to look in the mirror and think something like, "if I do this one more day, or if I agree to this, or if I allow this, I will lose my soul."


roman warrior fighting in a cloud of dust with a superimposed 'POW' Finding Our Voice, Managing Anger
by Patricia R. Adson, PhD

There is a difference between feeling angry and acting angry. Angry actions and loud words may scare other people, or allow you to express yourself and vent, but in interpersonal relationships, such actions seldom get the results we desire.


silhouette of George and the Dragon statue, Moscow, in front of a sunset sky Authentic Archetypal Branding
by Carol S. Pearson, PhD, DMin

After Awakening the Heroes Within (1991) was published, I began to recognize the archetypes I wrote about being used in advertisements. I was aware that too many individuals and organizations focus on promoting an image of themselves unrelated to what they genuinely care about and value. When there is a large gap between the real self and what we are trying to convince the world we are, the result is, at best, a shallow and empty life.


dark purple book cover with a phoenix rising titled What Stories Are You Living Reviews and Excerpts
Dr. Pearson’s book will introduce the rich archetypal journey of Jungian individuation to the novice and deepen the competency of the advanced reader to use Jungian archetypes for awareness and evolution towards one’s highest self.


office workers around a table with archetype symbols over their heads Working with Teams through the PMAI® Archetypes
May 07, 2021 by Kesstan Blandin, PhD

All organizations, teams, or any group with a common mission, will confront archetypal moments, those difficult decisions on how best to go forward when what you decide will have impact on the organization and customers.


three coworkers holding coffee cups and laughing Archetypes Are Oriented Around a Core Quality
Jun 17, 2021 by Kesstan Blandin, PhD

People accurately and intuitively understand that the archetypes symbolically represent universal human qualities. A common misunderstanding though is if an archetype is not active in your Archetype Profile, then you are lacking the core quality it represents. Having an archetypal character rank low in your Profile does not mean you are lacking that quality but indicates you are not identified with it and likely not accessing it, at least not with ease. In this article, we explain how identifying each archetype with a core quality is distinct from using that same quality through the other archetypes.


woman with red backpack standing at a forked path in the woods Archetypes are Fluid and Dynamic
Feb 13, 2023 by Kesstan Blandin, PhD

If you happen to take the PMAI® assessment again, you will likely notice the same characters congregating near the top and bottom of your profile, but not always in the same positions. Our newest article discusses the fluid and dynamic nature of archetypes and how the PMAI instrument can be used to reveal your growth or the growth of your clients over time.


This article is suggested reading
child's drawing with three trees, sun, and house with a cat on the roof Archetypes, Projective Drawing, and Autistic Teenagers
Aug 19, 2021 by Katherine Culpepper, MFT

Katherine Culpepper works with autistic teenagers seeking vocational training after high school using Projective House-Tree-Person (HTP) Drawings in combination with the PMAI® assessment and archetype system. By combining a narrative approach to the interpretation of the work of art with the PMAI archetypes, students relate readily to the method and enjoy gaining insight into themselves.


diverse millennials, and a senior woman executive. share a moment of understanding Types of Leaders, Types of Knowledge
Jun 21, 2023 by Merle Singer and Kesstan Blandin, PhD

Technology has become an increasingly significant source of knowledge for leaders in the twenty-first century, possibly creating a shift in the archetypal dynamics of leaders today. In this first article on "Leadership Narratives" a mixed methods research study, conducted between 2018-2020 by Merle Singer and Heather Round, explores how our volatile world is changing the leadership narratives for seasoned female professionals and early-career female and male millennials in corporate Australia and the United States.


The hero’s journey is the symbolic process of growing into one’s authentic self. The Roots of the Pearson-Marr Archetypes
by Kesstan Blandin, PhD

In this article, Kesstan Blandin provides basic definitions and distinctions between C.G. Jung, Joseph Campbell, and Carol Pearson’s work on archetypes as a way to deepen your understanding of the PMAI® archetypes.


The hero archetype, Saint George, slays the outlaw dragon Archetypes, Brands, and the Quest for Meaning
by Margaret Mark

In Margaret Mark's career in advertising, she was often dumbfounded by the extent to which brands took on meaning for people - often across cultures and over decades. Apple, Coke, Disney, Nike. What made these entities so powerful, with the capacity to transcend time and place?

In this article Mark describes her quest for insight and how it eventually led her to archetypes and Carol Pearson's work.


The Ruler archetype exhibits qualities such as being decisive and working to establish order. How Archetypes Transform Personality
by Kesstan Blandin, PhD

Understanding our archetypes as only representative of personality can be limiting. In this article Kesstan Blandin describes how your PMAI® archetypes point to archetypal narratives currently active in your life, not only to highlight aspects of your personality, but to point to the hidden potential within you.


Hope is the link between current reality (Realist) and future possibilities (Idealist). Pandora’s Hope: An Archetypal Reading
Apr 11, 2022 by Kesstan Blandin, PhD

The two archetypes of Idealist and Realist are a complementary pair. We all have an ideal of what our life should be like and the belief that our future can be different from our past, but the challenges of reality get in the way. Yet hope prevails. Balancing the Idealist and Realist can help us be grounded in reality while allowing for possibilities of a positive future.


Understanding the PMAI® archetypes can help improve family dynamics or settle conflicts, even while online gaming Archetypes and Family Dynamics
Sep 14, 2022 by Yvonne Nelson-Reid, PhD

In this month's article Yvonne Nelson-Reid highlights an area not often talked about; the impact of archetypes on family dynamics. In order to do this Yvonne uses the World of Warcraft gaming, as played between the three men in her family.


Students with low self-efficacy are more likely to give up when faced with difficult circumstances. The Impact of Low Scoring Archetypes on College Student Success
Oct 17, 2022 by Mona AlQadi, PhD

This month new author Mona AlQadi, PhD reports on her dissertation research using the PMAI® to gain a deeper understanding of the unconscious archetypal narratives at play in underperformance in college students. Her study yields several insights into the relationship between low-scoring archetypes and students’ attitudes, behaviors, and worries toward their academic goals.


World of Warcraft players, like this elf lady in green, play out enchanted archetypal stories What Story Are You Playing?
May 18, 2023 by Logan Abbitt

When looking for a little enchantment in life what archetypal story do you like to play? In this second article, Logan Abbitt compares 6 more of the PMAI archetypes with some of the mythical characters played out in the high fantasy game World of Warcraft (WoW).


Girl playing World of Warcraft online, immersed in her epic, mythical archetypal story. What Story Are You Playing?
Apr 18, 2023 by Logan Abbitt

What archetypal story are you playing? Online high fantasy games, such as World of Warcraft (WoW), can be a way to play out your archetypal stories. In this month's article, Logan Abbitt, a longtime WoW player, gives us insight into how the PMAI® archetypes can crossover into the character roles in games like WoW.


Bringing Archetype (PMAI®) Together with Type (MBTI®)
Apr 02, 2024 by Kesstan Blandin, PhD

Though archetypes (PMAI) and personality type (MBTI) express different aspects of one's personality, one fluid and one fixed, together they bestow a depth of self-understanding. This month, Kesstan Blandin, PhD, distinguishes the contrasting nature of these two systems and how they ground or emphasize each other in a way that can accelerate self-growth.


Archetype & Personality Type: From Theoretical to Personal
Jul 18, 2024 by Kesstan Blandin, PhD and Yvonne Nelson-Reid, PhD

This is the third article in a four-part series discussing the relationships between the theories of the PMAI® and MBTI® instruments. Following two previous articles that discussed the ways the theories of archetype and type converge and diverge, as well as the empirical correlations between the two instruments, this article presents insights gained through qualitative research. Of particular interest covered are the strengths, gifts, and Allies; various types of shadow elements in the psyche; and how to lean into archetypal flexibility.